Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had valid jurisdiction to reopen assessment for 2020-21. The AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 28.03.2024, which was within the prescribed three-year limitation period. The court found that the first notice dated 28.03.2024 was crucial for determining the limitation timeline, and the subsequent notice on 22.04.2024 was immaterial. The petition was deemed premature, with liberty granted to the petitioner to participate in the assessment proceedings and cooperate with the revenue authorities.
HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) had valid jurisdiction to reopen assessment for 2020-21. The AO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 28.03.2024, which was within the prescribed three-year limitation period. The court found that the first notice dated 28.03.2024 was crucial for determining the limitation timeline, and the subsequent notice on 22.04.2024 was immaterial. The petition was deemed premature, with liberty granted to the petitioner to participate in the assessment proceedings and cooperate with the revenue authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
