Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT ruled that a foreign company with Permanent Establishment (PE) in India can set off PE losses against Foreign Technical Services (FTS) income under section 71 of the Income Tax Act. Despite section 115A(3) restricting expenditure deductions, the tribunal found no explicit prohibition on loss set-off. The assessee is permitted to adjust inter-head income streams, as both income sources fall under the business category. The decision relies on treaty interpretation principles and allows the taxpayer to apply beneficial provisions of the domestic tax law in the absence of specific treaty provisions governing loss set-off.
ITAT ruled that a foreign company with Permanent Establishment (PE) in India can set off PE losses against Foreign Technical Services (FTS) income under section 71 of the Income Tax Act. Despite section 115A(3) restricting expenditure deductions, the tribunal found no explicit prohibition on loss set-off. The assessee is permitted to adjust inter-head income streams, as both income sources fall under the business category. The decision relies on treaty interpretation principles and allows the taxpayer to apply beneficial provisions of the domestic tax law in the absence of specific treaty provisions governing loss set-off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.