Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT ruled that a foreign company with Permanent Establishment (PE) in India can set off PE losses against Foreign Technical Services (FTS) income under section 71 of the Income Tax Act. Despite section 115A(3) restricting expenditure deductions, the tribunal found no explicit prohibition on loss set-off. The assessee is permitted to adjust inter-head income streams, as both income sources fall under the business category. The decision relies on treaty interpretation principles and allows the taxpayer to apply beneficial provisions of the domestic tax law in the absence of specific treaty provisions governing loss set-off.
ITAT ruled that a foreign company with Permanent Establishment (PE) in India can set off PE losses against Foreign Technical Services (FTS) income under section 71 of the Income Tax Act. Despite section 115A(3) restricting expenditure deductions, the tribunal found no explicit prohibition on loss set-off. The assessee is permitted to adjust inter-head income streams, as both income sources fall under the business category. The decision relies on treaty interpretation principles and allows the taxpayer to apply beneficial provisions of the domestic tax law in the absence of specific treaty provisions governing loss set-off.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
