Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the assessment order dated 13.12.2023 was not time-barred due to successive government notifications extending the statutory time limit for GST assessment proceedings for FY 2017-18. Specifically, notifications dated 21.07.2022 and 24.04.2023 extended the time limit to 31.12.2023, rendering the impugned order legally valid. Since the order was passed within the extended timeline and the notifications were not challenged, the writ petition was deemed non-maintainable, with the statutory remedy of appeal being the appropriate recourse. Consequently, the HC dismissed the petition.
HC held that the assessment order dated 13.12.2023 was not time-barred due to successive government notifications extending the statutory time limit for GST assessment proceedings for FY 2017-18. Specifically, notifications dated 21.07.2022 and 24.04.2023 extended the time limit to 31.12.2023, rendering the impugned order legally valid. Since the order was passed within the extended timeline and the notifications were not challenged, the writ petition was deemed non-maintainable, with the statutory remedy of appeal being the appropriate recourse. Consequently, the HC dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
