Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC held that for calculating the 6-year limitation period under Section 153C(1), the relevant date is 30.06.2022, when documents were collected from the petitioner, not the search date of 10.11.2020. The show cause notice dated 30.12.2024 is within limitation. The petitioner retains the right to respond to the notice and contest proceedings. Despite a prior settlement, the Department retains liberty to pursue further action if new materials emerge. The writ petitions were consequently dismissed, finding no merit in the petitioner's limitation arguments.
HC held that for calculating the 6-year limitation period under Section 153C(1), the relevant date is 30.06.2022, when documents were collected from the petitioner, not the search date of 10.11.2020. The show cause notice dated 30.12.2024 is within limitation. The petitioner retains the right to respond to the notice and contest proceedings. Despite a prior settlement, the Department retains liberty to pursue further action if new materials emerge. The writ petitions were consequently dismissed, finding no merit in the petitioner's limitation arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.