Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that for calculating the 6-year limitation period under Section 153C(1), the relevant date is 30.06.2022, when documents were collected from the petitioner, not the search date of 10.11.2020. The show cause notice dated 30.12.2024 is within limitation. The petitioner retains the right to respond to the notice and contest proceedings. Despite a prior settlement, the Department retains liberty to pursue further action if new materials emerge. The writ petitions were consequently dismissed, finding no merit in the petitioner's limitation arguments.
HC held that for calculating the 6-year limitation period under Section 153C(1), the relevant date is 30.06.2022, when documents were collected from the petitioner, not the search date of 10.11.2020. The show cause notice dated 30.12.2024 is within limitation. The petitioner retains the right to respond to the notice and contest proceedings. Despite a prior settlement, the Department retains liberty to pursue further action if new materials emerge. The writ petitions were consequently dismissed, finding no merit in the petitioner's limitation arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
