Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
ITAT partially allowed the appeal, holding that the transaction with Kamineni Health Care Pvt. Ltd. was an investment, not a loan, thereby deleting the disallowance of interest expenses. For the loan to United Steel Allied Ind Private Limited, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s view, directing the AO to levy interest for the actual loan period. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate claims of commercial exigency or business connection between the companies, thus treating the advances as loans under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was consequently partly allowed with specific directions to the Assessing Officer.
ITAT partially allowed the appeal, holding that the transaction with Kamineni Health Care Pvt. Ltd. was an investment, not a loan, thereby deleting the disallowance of interest expenses. For the loan to United Steel Allied Ind Private Limited, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s view, directing the AO to levy interest for the actual loan period. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate claims of commercial exigency or business connection between the companies, thus treating the advances as loans under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was consequently partly allowed with specific directions to the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
