Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3481 to 3500 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on two key grounds: (1) No disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was warranted since the payee offered the interest income to tax in their return, consistent with Supreme Court precedent; (2) Deduction under Section 80IB/80IA was permissible despite not being initially claimed in the original return, with the appellate authority empowered to consider such claims. The tribunal set aside the lower authority's order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction, effectively providing relief to the assessee on both disputed issues.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on two key grounds: (1) No disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was warranted since the payee offered the interest income to tax in their return, consistent with Supreme Court precedent; (2) Deduction under Section 80IB/80IA was permissible despite not being initially claimed in the original return, with the appellate authority empowered to consider such claims. The tribunal set aside the lower authority's order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction, effectively providing relief to the assessee on both disputed issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
