Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on two key grounds: (1) No disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was warranted since the payee offered the interest income to tax in their return, consistent with Supreme Court precedent; (2) Deduction under Section 80IB/80IA was permissible despite not being initially claimed in the original return, with the appellate authority empowered to consider such claims. The tribunal set aside the lower authority's order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction, effectively providing relief to the assessee on both disputed issues.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal on two key grounds: (1) No disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was warranted since the payee offered the interest income to tax in their return, consistent with Supreme Court precedent; (2) Deduction under Section 80IB/80IA was permissible despite not being initially claimed in the original return, with the appellate authority empowered to consider such claims. The tribunal set aside the lower authority's order and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition and allow the deduction, effectively providing relief to the assessee on both disputed issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
