Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.