Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.