Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
ITAT partially allowed assessee's appeal, affirming arm's-length royalty payments and consultancy service expenses based on consistent prior year rulings. The tribunal directed deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to expatriate costs and reimbursements. Regarding income tax liability provision, the tribunal accepted the assessee's contention that reversal of previously disallowed provision should not result in double taxation, allowing the ground subject to AO's verification. The decision upholds procedural fairness and prevents duplicative tax treatment of contingent liabilities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
