Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving surface rights and intangible asset depreciation claims. The tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting amortization of surface rights based on evidence that the mining rights acquisition did not confer tangible benefits to the transferor entity. Regarding depreciation on equity shares issued free of cost, the tribunal rejected the claim, finding no demonstrable business advantage or documentary proof of technical support. The tribunal sustained lower authorities' orders, dismissing the assessee's claim for depreciation on the purported intangible asset. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantive evidence to support tax deduction claims related to business rights and asset acquisitions.
ITAT adjudicated a tax dispute involving surface rights and intangible asset depreciation claims. The tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, permitting amortization of surface rights based on evidence that the mining rights acquisition did not confer tangible benefits to the transferor entity. Regarding depreciation on equity shares issued free of cost, the tribunal rejected the claim, finding no demonstrable business advantage or documentary proof of technical support. The tribunal sustained lower authorities' orders, dismissing the assessee's claim for depreciation on the purported intangible asset. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantive evidence to support tax deduction claims related to business rights and asset acquisitions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
