Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled that the delivery agent (Respondent No. 4), registered as an Authorized Sea Agent, is bound by the waiver letter issued by Respondent No. 2. Under Regulations, 2018, the agent cannot demand container detention charges when customs verifies entries and finds them correct. The court directed Respondent No. 4 to release the goods and implement the waiver for detention charges from 24.12.2024 to 10.01.2025, as per Regulation 10(1)(l). The petitioner is exempted from paying detention charges, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
HC ruled that the delivery agent (Respondent No. 4), registered as an Authorized Sea Agent, is bound by the waiver letter issued by Respondent No. 2. Under Regulations, 2018, the agent cannot demand container detention charges when customs verifies entries and finds them correct. The court directed Respondent No. 4 to release the goods and implement the waiver for detention charges from 24.12.2024 to 10.01.2025, as per Regulation 10(1)(l). The petitioner is exempted from paying detention charges, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.