Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition challenging Policy Circular No. 06/2018 and subsequent Show Cause Notice as premature. The court held that the Show Cause Notice was a consequential proceeding related to an original order by DGFT, and therefore, premature judicial intervention was unwarranted. No interim relief was granted, and the petition was dismissed in limine, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the original DGFT order through appropriate legal channels.
HC dismissed the petition challenging Policy Circular No. 06/2018 and subsequent Show Cause Notice as premature. The court held that the Show Cause Notice was a consequential proceeding related to an original order by DGFT, and therefore, premature judicial intervention was unwarranted. No interim relief was granted, and the petition was dismissed in limine, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the original DGFT order through appropriate legal channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.