Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
NCLAT addressed a dispute regarding an onerous Leave and License Agreement under Regulation 10 of Liquidation Regulations. The Tribunal unanimously held that the transaction dated 07.06.2019 was unprofitable and burdensome, qualifying as an onerous property. Both Technical and Judicial Members concurred that the liquidator could disclaim the contract. The Tribunal definitively ruled that Regulation 10 is not ultra vires to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as it was validly enacted under Section 35(1)(o). Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudicating authority's original order and confirming the liquidator's power to disclaim the onerous property.
NCLAT addressed a dispute regarding an onerous Leave and License Agreement under Regulation 10 of Liquidation Regulations. The Tribunal unanimously held that the transaction dated 07.06.2019 was unprofitable and burdensome, qualifying as an onerous property. Both Technical and Judicial Members concurred that the liquidator could disclaim the contract. The Tribunal definitively ruled that Regulation 10 is not ultra vires to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, as it was validly enacted under Section 35(1)(o). Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the adjudicating authority's original order and confirming the liquidator's power to disclaim the onerous property.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
