Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
NCLAT affirmed the Resolution Professional's calculation of worker's salary claim at Rs.185,62,360/- for layoff period. The tribunal determined that the Resolution Professional correctly admitted the claim without challenging its quantum. The Adjudicating Authority explicitly noted that determining workers' entitlements under Industrial Dispute Act falls outside its jurisdictional scope. Consequently, no procedural errors were found in the original order, and the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the initial claim calculation and maintaining the Resolution Professional's original determination.
NCLAT affirmed the Resolution Professional's calculation of worker's salary claim at Rs.185,62,360/- for layoff period. The tribunal determined that the Resolution Professional correctly admitted the claim without challenging its quantum. The Adjudicating Authority explicitly noted that determining workers' entitlements under Industrial Dispute Act falls outside its jurisdictional scope. Consequently, no procedural errors were found in the original order, and the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the initial claim calculation and maintaining the Resolution Professional's original determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
