Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT affirmed the Resolution Professional's calculation of worker's salary claim at Rs.185,62,360/- for layoff period. The tribunal determined that the Resolution Professional correctly admitted the claim without challenging its quantum. The Adjudicating Authority explicitly noted that determining workers' entitlements under Industrial Dispute Act falls outside its jurisdictional scope. Consequently, no procedural errors were found in the original order, and the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the initial claim calculation and maintaining the Resolution Professional's original determination.
NCLAT affirmed the Resolution Professional's calculation of worker's salary claim at Rs.185,62,360/- for layoff period. The tribunal determined that the Resolution Professional correctly admitted the claim without challenging its quantum. The Adjudicating Authority explicitly noted that determining workers' entitlements under Industrial Dispute Act falls outside its jurisdictional scope. Consequently, no procedural errors were found in the original order, and the appeal was summarily dismissed, upholding the initial claim calculation and maintaining the Resolution Professional's original determination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
