Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on joint property ownership and tax deduction claims. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim under Section 54, finding no legal impediment to claiming deduction for jointly purchased property. The key determination focused on proportional investment and preventing double taxation. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify no duplicate deduction was claimed and allow Section 54 deduction corresponding to the assessee's actual investment in the new residential property. Regarding deemed rental income, the tribunal remanded the matter to the AO to determine the Annual Letting Value based on municipal rentable value, proportionate to the assessee's property share, due to insufficient documentary evidence of business usage.
ITAT ruled on joint property ownership and tax deduction claims. The tribunal allowed the assessee's claim under Section 54, finding no legal impediment to claiming deduction for jointly purchased property. The key determination focused on proportional investment and preventing double taxation. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify no duplicate deduction was claimed and allow Section 54 deduction corresponding to the assessee's actual investment in the new residential property. Regarding deemed rental income, the tribunal remanded the matter to the AO to determine the Annual Letting Value based on municipal rentable value, proportionate to the assessee's property share, due to insufficient documentary evidence of business usage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
