Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
CESTAT adjudicated customs duty exemption for digital still image video cameras, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal held that the imported cameras qualify for basic customs duty exemption under notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended on 17.03.2012. The appellants were granted full exemption from basic customs duty, setting aside the previous restrictive interpretation. The Tribunal's ruling affirmed the broader applicability of the customs duty exemption notification, thereby allowing the customs appeals and providing relief to the importer.
CESTAT adjudicated customs duty exemption for digital still image video cameras, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The Tribunal held that the imported cameras qualify for basic customs duty exemption under notification dated 01.03.2005, as amended on 17.03.2012. The appellants were granted full exemption from basic customs duty, setting aside the previous restrictive interpretation. The Tribunal's ruling affirmed the broader applicability of the customs duty exemption notification, thereby allowing the customs appeals and providing relief to the importer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.