Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CESTAT held that Education Cess, Secondary Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess credits carried forward under pre-GST regime are not refundable. The amendment to Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 retrospectively excluded cesses from "eligible duties and taxes" definition, rendering such credits inadmissible for GST utilization. The transitional provisions specifically preclude transmission of these cess credits through Tran-1 form. Consequently, the appellant's claim for refund was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was upheld without any legal or factual infirmities.
CESTAT held that Education Cess, Secondary Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess credits carried forward under pre-GST regime are not refundable. The amendment to Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 retrospectively excluded cesses from "eligible duties and taxes" definition, rendering such credits inadmissible for GST utilization. The transitional provisions specifically preclude transmission of these cess credits through Tran-1 form. Consequently, the appellant's claim for refund was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was upheld without any legal or factual infirmities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
