Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
CESTAT held that Education Cess, Secondary Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess credits carried forward under pre-GST regime are not refundable. The amendment to Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 retrospectively excluded cesses from "eligible duties and taxes" definition, rendering such credits inadmissible for GST utilization. The transitional provisions specifically preclude transmission of these cess credits through Tran-1 form. Consequently, the appellant's claim for refund was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was upheld without any legal or factual infirmities.
CESTAT held that Education Cess, Secondary Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess credits carried forward under pre-GST regime are not refundable. The amendment to Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017 retrospectively excluded cesses from "eligible duties and taxes" definition, rendering such credits inadmissible for GST utilization. The transitional provisions specifically preclude transmission of these cess credits through Tran-1 form. Consequently, the appellant's claim for refund was rejected, and the Commissioner (Appeals) order was upheld without any legal or factual infirmities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.