Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
HC dismissed the appeal, rejecting the plaintiff's plaint for permanent injunction. The court found critical deficiencies in the plaintiff's legal standing, specifically a non-disclosure of legal rights to the subject property. The plaintiff failed to establish a clear cause of action and proper legal basis for the suit. The court determined that any grievances regarding company mismanagement should be addressed under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, rather than through the current litigation. The judgment emphasized procedural inadequacies and lack of substantive legal grounds, rendering the suit non-maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without interference.
HC dismissed the appeal, rejecting the plaintiff's plaint for permanent injunction. The court found critical deficiencies in the plaintiff's legal standing, specifically a non-disclosure of legal rights to the subject property. The plaintiff failed to establish a clear cause of action and proper legal basis for the suit. The court determined that any grievances regarding company mismanagement should be addressed under Section 241 of the Companies Act, 2013, rather than through the current litigation. The judgment emphasized procedural inadequacies and lack of substantive legal grounds, rendering the suit non-maintainable. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.