Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal of the Personal Guarantor (PG), affirming the validity of notice service under the Guarantee Deed. The Tribunal held that notices were properly sent to the last known address, and the Resolution Professional complied with Sections 95 and 99 of the IBC. The Appellant failed to dispute the underlying debt or demonstrate procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the borrower and guarantor are legally permissible, and the PG remains liable for repayment despite the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the primary borrower.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal of the Personal Guarantor (PG), affirming the validity of notice service under the Guarantee Deed. The Tribunal held that notices were properly sent to the last known address, and the Resolution Professional complied with Sections 95 and 99 of the IBC. The Appellant failed to dispute the underlying debt or demonstrate procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the borrower and guarantor are legally permissible, and the PG remains liable for repayment despite the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the primary borrower.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
