Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal of the Personal Guarantor (PG), affirming the validity of notice service under the Guarantee Deed. The Tribunal held that notices were properly sent to the last known address, and the Resolution Professional complied with Sections 95 and 99 of the IBC. The Appellant failed to dispute the underlying debt or demonstrate procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the borrower and guarantor are legally permissible, and the PG remains liable for repayment despite the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the primary borrower.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal of the Personal Guarantor (PG), affirming the validity of notice service under the Guarantee Deed. The Tribunal held that notices were properly sent to the last known address, and the Resolution Professional complied with Sections 95 and 99 of the IBC. The Appellant failed to dispute the underlying debt or demonstrate procedural non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized that simultaneous insolvency proceedings against the borrower and guarantor are legally permissible, and the PG remains liable for repayment despite the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the primary borrower.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
