Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 85(i)(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act for failing to remit ESI contributions deducted from employees' salaries. The Court rejected arguments challenging liability, affirming the Trial Court's sentence of imprisonment and fine. Referencing precedent in A K Abdul Samad, the Court emphasized statutory interpretation requires strict adherence to legislative intent. The appellant, as General Manager and Principal Employer, was found legally responsible for ESI contribution remittance. The Court directed the appellant to surrender and serve the prescribed sentence, with the appeal ultimately being dismissed.
SC upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 85(i)(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act for failing to remit ESI contributions deducted from employees' salaries. The Court rejected arguments challenging liability, affirming the Trial Court's sentence of imprisonment and fine. Referencing precedent in A K Abdul Samad, the Court emphasized statutory interpretation requires strict adherence to legislative intent. The appellant, as General Manager and Principal Employer, was found legally responsible for ESI contribution remittance. The Court directed the appellant to surrender and serve the prescribed sentence, with the appeal ultimately being dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
