Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismisses appeal in cheque dishonour case, affirming lower court's acquittal. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite allegations of business contribution and third-party payments, no cogent documentary evidence was produced to substantiate claims. Accused effectively rebutted presumption of debt through substantial counter-evidence. The court found Complainant's assertions unsubstantiated and lacking credibility, particularly regarding guarantee or surety claims. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the original acquittal and placing onus of proof squarely on Complainant.
HC dismisses appeal in cheque dishonour case, affirming lower court's acquittal. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Despite allegations of business contribution and third-party payments, no cogent documentary evidence was produced to substantiate claims. Accused effectively rebutted presumption of debt through substantial counter-evidence. The court found Complainant's assertions unsubstantiated and lacking credibility, particularly regarding guarantee or surety claims. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the original acquittal and placing onus of proof squarely on Complainant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
