Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT affirmed the DRT's Section 7 application admission against the corporate debtor. The tribunal found multiple debt acknowledgments within the three-year limitation period, specifically noting acknowledgments on 28.01.2014, 07.05.2014, and subsequent communications in 2016 and 2017. The court determined the application filed on 13.11.2019 was timely due to these acknowledgments. The Resolution Professional was authorized to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), with interim orders vacated and the period from 29.08.2022 excluded from CIRP calculation. The appellant was directed to surrender corporate assets, having failed to make payments after 30.06.2015.
NCLAT affirmed the DRT's Section 7 application admission against the corporate debtor. The tribunal found multiple debt acknowledgments within the three-year limitation period, specifically noting acknowledgments on 28.01.2014, 07.05.2014, and subsequent communications in 2016 and 2017. The court determined the application filed on 13.11.2019 was timely due to these acknowledgments. The Resolution Professional was authorized to proceed with Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), with interim orders vacated and the period from 29.08.2022 excluded from CIRP calculation. The appellant was directed to surrender corporate assets, having failed to make payments after 30.06.2015.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.