Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC allowed the petition challenging the refund claim rejection. The court found that the respondent improperly rejected the refund application in GST RFD-03 by stating refund was not permissible due to voluntary payment. The court quashed the deficiency memo and remanded the matter back to the respondent to reconsider the refund application in GST RFD-01 in accordance with procedural rules, specifically Rules 89, 90, and 92 of GST Rules, and take appropriate action on the application's deficiencies.
HC allowed the petition challenging the refund claim rejection. The court found that the respondent improperly rejected the refund application in GST RFD-03 by stating refund was not permissible due to voluntary payment. The court quashed the deficiency memo and remanded the matter back to the respondent to reconsider the refund application in GST RFD-01 in accordance with procedural rules, specifically Rules 89, 90, and 92 of GST Rules, and take appropriate action on the application's deficiencies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
