Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, invalidating the trust registration cancellation. The tribunal found critical legal defects in the Assessing Officer's (AO) reference, including: (1) retrospective application of Finance Act, 2022 provisions to AY 2021-22, (2) reliance on seized search materials without independent verification, and (3) drawing presumptions without providing the assessee an opportunity to rebut. The ITAT held that the AO's satisfaction was procedurally flawed and based on "borrowed satisfaction," rendering the registration cancellation order legally unsustainable. The tribunal emphasized that mere possession of incriminating documents does not automatically establish wrongdoing without substantive corroborative evidence.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, invalidating the trust registration cancellation. The tribunal found critical legal defects in the Assessing Officer's (AO) reference, including: (1) retrospective application of Finance Act, 2022 provisions to AY 2021-22, (2) reliance on seized search materials without independent verification, and (3) drawing presumptions without providing the assessee an opportunity to rebut. The ITAT held that the AO's satisfaction was procedurally flawed and based on "borrowed satisfaction," rendering the registration cancellation order legally unsustainable. The tribunal emphasized that mere possession of incriminating documents does not automatically establish wrongdoing without substantive corroborative evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.