Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC dismissed criminal revision application challenging summons in corporate property dispute. Court held that the trial magistrate's summons under Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 was prima facie valid and did not warrant interference. The court emphasized that final determination of wrongful possession must occur during trial through evidence presentation. Precedential analysis from prior Supreme Court jurisprudence supported maintaining interlocutory proceedings without exceptional circumstances justifying judicial intervention. Revisional application was consequently found devoid of merit and summarily rejected, leaving original summons and potential prosecution intact.
HC dismissed criminal revision application challenging summons in corporate property dispute. Court held that the trial magistrate's summons under Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 was prima facie valid and did not warrant interference. The court emphasized that final determination of wrongful possession must occur during trial through evidence presentation. Precedential analysis from prior Supreme Court jurisprudence supported maintaining interlocutory proceedings without exceptional circumstances justifying judicial intervention. Revisional application was consequently found devoid of merit and summarily rejected, leaving original summons and potential prosecution intact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
