Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding IGST interest calculation on imported goods. The tribunal distinguished between Additional Duty of Customs and IGST, clarifying their distinct constitutional and statutory foundations. The key legal finding was that interest for delayed IGST payment should be calculated under Section 50 of CGST Act, not Section 28AB of Customs Act. The tribunal held that IGST on imported goods must be treated identically to inter-state supply IGST. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for recalculating interest at the applicable CGST Act rates, effectively allowing the appellant's appeal and directing a fresh interest computation consistent with statutory provisions.
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding IGST interest calculation on imported goods. The tribunal distinguished between Additional Duty of Customs and IGST, clarifying their distinct constitutional and statutory foundations. The key legal finding was that interest for delayed IGST payment should be calculated under Section 50 of CGST Act, not Section 28AB of Customs Act. The tribunal held that IGST on imported goods must be treated identically to inter-state supply IGST. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for recalculating interest at the applicable CGST Act rates, effectively allowing the appellant's appeal and directing a fresh interest computation consistent with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
