Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, quashing the AO's reassessment order under Section 148A(d). The court found the order was passed without application of mind, highlighting internal contradictions where the AO first acknowledged the income tax return's filing, then subsequently claimed no return was submitted. The decision emphasized the petitioner's submission of bank statements documenting funds borrowed from his father for cryptocurrency purchase, which were undisputed. The reassessment order was deemed legally unsustainable and was set aside, providing relief to the taxpayer by invalidating the reopening of the assessment.
HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, quashing the AO's reassessment order under Section 148A(d). The court found the order was passed without application of mind, highlighting internal contradictions where the AO first acknowledged the income tax return's filing, then subsequently claimed no return was submitted. The decision emphasized the petitioner's submission of bank statements documenting funds borrowed from his father for cryptocurrency purchase, which were undisputed. The reassessment order was deemed legally unsustainable and was set aside, providing relief to the taxpayer by invalidating the reopening of the assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
