Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The document represents an administrative order by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) regarding the re-assignment of pending appeals in the Kolkata Zone. Under the powers conferred by Central Excise Rules, 2017 and Service Tax Rules, 1994, the order systematically allocates 900 distinct service tax and central excise appeals to three specific commissioners: Pravin Kumar Agrawal (Audit-I), Kumar Amrendra Narayan (Howrah), and Sanjay Kumar Roy (Haldia). Each appeal is assigned a unique identification number, involves various businesses and individuals across different sectors, and specifies the registration details and the designated commissioner responsible for passing orders-in-appeal. The order appears to be an administrative reorganization mechanism for managing pending tax-related legal proceedings within the Kolkata tax jurisdiction.
The document represents an administrative order by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) regarding the re-assignment of pending appeals in the Kolkata Zone. Under the powers conferred by Central Excise Rules, 2017 and Service Tax Rules, 1994, the order systematically allocates 900 distinct service tax and central excise appeals to three specific commissioners: Pravin Kumar Agrawal (Audit-I), Kumar Amrendra Narayan (Howrah), and Sanjay Kumar Roy (Haldia). Each appeal is assigned a unique identification number, involves various businesses and individuals across different sectors, and specifies the registration details and the designated commissioner responsible for passing orders-in-appeal. The order appears to be an administrative reorganization mechanism for managing pending tax-related legal proceedings within the Kolkata tax jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.