Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
HC upheld the penalty order for non-compliance with e-way bill requirements under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The goods were intercepted on 19.01.2023 with invalid e-way bills: one bill was for a different vehicle than declared, and the other had expired prior to transportation. The Court followed precedential rulings establishing that absence of a valid e-way bill creates a rebuttable presumption of tax evasion. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut this presumption. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, affirming the mandatory nature of e-way bill compliance post-01.04.2018 and sustaining the imposed penalty.
HC upheld the penalty order for non-compliance with e-way bill requirements under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The goods were intercepted on 19.01.2023 with invalid e-way bills: one bill was for a different vehicle than declared, and the other had expired prior to transportation. The Court followed precedential rulings establishing that absence of a valid e-way bill creates a rebuttable presumption of tax evasion. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut this presumption. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, affirming the mandatory nature of e-way bill compliance post-01.04.2018 and sustaining the imposed penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
