Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that the civil suit concerning oppression and mismanagement is not maintainable. Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 explicitly bars civil court's jurisdiction in matters falling within NCLT's domain. The plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC as the suit is barred by law. The Court determined that plaintiffs must pursue their remedy before the specialized tribunal (NCLT), which possesses broader adjudicatory powers for expeditious resolution of corporate disputes. The suit stands rejected, with plaintiffs directed to seek appropriate relief through the designated corporate tribunal, without any observations on the substantive merits of the case.
HC held that the civil suit concerning oppression and mismanagement is not maintainable. Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 explicitly bars civil court's jurisdiction in matters falling within NCLT's domain. The plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC as the suit is barred by law. The Court determined that plaintiffs must pursue their remedy before the specialized tribunal (NCLT), which possesses broader adjudicatory powers for expeditious resolution of corporate disputes. The suit stands rejected, with plaintiffs directed to seek appropriate relief through the designated corporate tribunal, without any observations on the substantive merits of the case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
