Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC determined that flavoured milk sold by petitioner falls under tariff heading 0402, not CH 2202. The conversion charges for milk to milk powder were remanded for reassessment, with the appellate authority previously indicating a potential 5% tax rate instead of 18%. The original assessment order and appeal order were set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh assessment, specifically levying tax on flavoured milk under the specified tariff heading. The petition was subsequently disposed of, effectively returning the matter for reconsideration with specific guidance on tax classification and rate.
HC determined that flavoured milk sold by petitioner falls under tariff heading 0402, not CH 2202. The conversion charges for milk to milk powder were remanded for reassessment, with the appellate authority previously indicating a potential 5% tax rate instead of 18%. The original assessment order and appeal order were set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh assessment, specifically levying tax on flavoured milk under the specified tariff heading. The petition was subsequently disposed of, effectively returning the matter for reconsideration with specific guidance on tax classification and rate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.