Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 was improper. The AO lacked sufficient material to demonstrate income escaping assessment, as the taxpayer had already declared and paid tax on the transaction. The notice was beyond the prescribed three-year limitation period under Section 149(1), rendering it invalid. The court emphasized that the purpose of sharing information is to enable the assessee's response and allow the AO to make an informed decision. Consequently, the HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned notice, finding no justification for reassessment.
HC held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 was improper. The AO lacked sufficient material to demonstrate income escaping assessment, as the taxpayer had already declared and paid tax on the transaction. The notice was beyond the prescribed three-year limitation period under Section 149(1), rendering it invalid. The court emphasized that the purpose of sharing information is to enable the assessee's response and allow the AO to make an informed decision. Consequently, the HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned notice, finding no justification for reassessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.