Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated a service tax dispute involving import of services, finding no substantive evidence that foreign currency payments constituted taxable imported services within India. The tribunal determined that services were utilized abroad, rendering them an export of service, and thus not subject to service tax. The department's demand was based solely on foreign exchange earnings without proving actual service receipt in India. Additionally, the tribunal found the proceedings time-barred under the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the service tax demand, interest, and potential penalties, effectively allowing the appellant's appeal and rejecting the revenue's claim of service tax liability.
CESTAT adjudicated a service tax dispute involving import of services, finding no substantive evidence that foreign currency payments constituted taxable imported services within India. The tribunal determined that services were utilized abroad, rendering them an export of service, and thus not subject to service tax. The department's demand was based solely on foreign exchange earnings without proving actual service receipt in India. Additionally, the tribunal found the proceedings time-barred under the extended period of limitation. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the service tax demand, interest, and potential penalties, effectively allowing the appellant's appeal and rejecting the revenue's claim of service tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.