Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC analyzed a cheque dishonour case involving alleged material alteration of amount from Rs. 1,90,000/- to Rs. 4,90,000/-. The court determined that the accused lacked authority to modify the cheque amount, as the figure and words were written by different persons. Previous case law references were distinguished. The trial court's order was set aside, and the court directed forensic examination of the cheque upon expense deposit by the accused. The petition was allowed, mandating expert verification of the potential alteration to determine the cheque's validity under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
HC analyzed a cheque dishonour case involving alleged material alteration of amount from Rs. 1,90,000/- to Rs. 4,90,000/-. The court determined that the accused lacked authority to modify the cheque amount, as the figure and words were written by different persons. Previous case law references were distinguished. The trial court's order was set aside, and the court directed forensic examination of the cheque upon expense deposit by the accused. The petition was allowed, mandating expert verification of the potential alteration to determine the cheque's validity under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.