Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismisses writ petition challenging seizure of gold bars exceeding permissible import limit. The court upheld lower authorities' decision denying option to pay fine under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Distinguishing prior precedents, the court noted the instant case involved gold bars significantly over legal limit, unlike previous cases with jewelry within permissible quantum. The court found no merit in petitioners' arguments and rejected interference under Article 226, thereby confirming the original confiscation order and declining alternative fine payment option.
HC dismisses writ petition challenging seizure of gold bars exceeding permissible import limit. The court upheld lower authorities' decision denying option to pay fine under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962. Distinguishing prior precedents, the court noted the instant case involved gold bars significantly over legal limit, unlike previous cases with jewelry within permissible quantum. The court found no merit in petitioners' arguments and rejected interference under Article 226, thereby confirming the original confiscation order and declining alternative fine payment option.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.