Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
HC dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act. The court held that factual issues regarding penalty imposition, transaction benefits, and financial year challenges should be adjudicated through the appellate process. The petitioner retains the right to contest the CGST Department's penalty under Section 122(1A) through appropriate appellate channels, with the appellate authority deemed most suitable to comprehensively examine the matter.
HC dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to pursue appellate remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act. The court held that factual issues regarding penalty imposition, transaction benefits, and financial year challenges should be adjudicated through the appellate process. The petitioner retains the right to contest the CGST Department's penalty under Section 122(1A) through appropriate appellate channels, with the appellate authority deemed most suitable to comprehensively examine the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.