Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC held that the transfer development rights (TDR)/floor space index (FSI) under entry 5-B cannot be interpreted to include development agreements where a developer obtains construction rights in exchange for transferring certain built-up units. The specific development agreement dated 07.4.2022 between the parties did not fall within the scope of the GST notification dated 28.6.2017 as amended. Consequently, the show cause notice and subsequent order were quashed, effectively invalidating the tax demand and allowing the petitioner's challenge against the taxation assessment.
HC held that the transfer development rights (TDR)/floor space index (FSI) under entry 5-B cannot be interpreted to include development agreements where a developer obtains construction rights in exchange for transferring certain built-up units. The specific development agreement dated 07.4.2022 between the parties did not fall within the scope of the GST notification dated 28.6.2017 as amended. Consequently, the show cause notice and subsequent order were quashed, effectively invalidating the tax demand and allowing the petitioner's challenge against the taxation assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.