Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
HC held that the transfer development rights (TDR)/floor space index (FSI) under entry 5-B cannot be interpreted to include development agreements where a developer obtains construction rights in exchange for transferring certain built-up units. The specific development agreement dated 07.4.2022 between the parties did not fall within the scope of the GST notification dated 28.6.2017 as amended. Consequently, the show cause notice and subsequent order were quashed, effectively invalidating the tax demand and allowing the petitioner's challenge against the taxation assessment.
HC held that the transfer development rights (TDR)/floor space index (FSI) under entry 5-B cannot be interpreted to include development agreements where a developer obtains construction rights in exchange for transferring certain built-up units. The specific development agreement dated 07.4.2022 between the parties did not fall within the scope of the GST notification dated 28.6.2017 as amended. Consequently, the show cause notice and subsequent order were quashed, effectively invalidating the tax demand and allowing the petitioner's challenge against the taxation assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.