Transfer-pricing benchmarking and capital-receipt principles sustained taxpayer relief, while unsupported property-advance write-offs remained disallo...
Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT ruled on a trust's tax exemption under section 11, addressing multiple key issues: The tribunal held that exemption denial under section 13 should be limited only to the specific income violating provisions, not the entire trust income. The maximum marginal rate shall apply exclusively to the contravened income portion (Rs. 1,80,000), not the complete trust income. Regarding section 69A, impounded unverified documents were deemed insufficient for making unexplained income additions. The tribunal allowed exemption under section 11, permitted depreciation claim as an application of income, and confirmed that the trust could claim either depreciation or capital expenditure application, ensuring statutory compliance while preventing potential administrative overreach.
ITAT ruled on a trust's tax exemption under section 11, addressing multiple key issues: The tribunal held that exemption denial under section 13 should be limited only to the specific income violating provisions, not the entire trust income. The maximum marginal rate shall apply exclusively to the contravened income portion (Rs. 1,80,000), not the complete trust income. Regarding section 69A, impounded unverified documents were deemed insufficient for making unexplained income additions. The tribunal allowed exemption under section 11, permitted depreciation claim as an application of income, and confirmed that the trust could claim either depreciation or capital expenditure application, ensuring statutory compliance while preventing potential administrative overreach.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.