Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
ITAT held that passenger system services provided by a US-based company to an Indian airline do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of India-USA DTAA. The tribunal determined that no specific technology was made available to the Indian entity, and the services were rendered using standard software supported by the service provider's data center. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding the receipts non-taxable in India, effectively dismissing the revenue department's contentions regarding taxation under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act as procedurally academic.
ITAT held that passenger system services provided by a US-based company to an Indian airline do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of India-USA DTAA. The tribunal determined that no specific technology was made available to the Indian entity, and the services were rendered using standard software supported by the service provider's data center. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding the receipts non-taxable in India, effectively dismissing the revenue department's contentions regarding taxation under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act as procedurally academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.