Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
ITAT held that passenger system services provided by a US-based company to an Indian airline do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of India-USA DTAA. The tribunal determined that no specific technology was made available to the Indian entity, and the services were rendered using standard software supported by the service provider's data center. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding the receipts non-taxable in India, effectively dismissing the revenue department's contentions regarding taxation under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act as procedurally academic.
ITAT held that passenger system services provided by a US-based company to an Indian airline do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 12 of India-USA DTAA. The tribunal determined that no specific technology was made available to the Indian entity, and the services were rendered using standard software supported by the service provider's data center. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s order, finding the receipts non-taxable in India, effectively dismissing the revenue department's contentions regarding taxation under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act as procedurally academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
