Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC ruled that the period from 13th March 2018 to 26th November 2019 shall be excluded in computing the limitation period for suit filing under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court found the IBC proceedings were bona fide, noting operational creditors routinely file such proceedings due to corporate debtor's potential inability to satisfy debts. The defendant could not challenge the plaintiff's good faith in initiating IBC proceedings, and no assertion was made that such proceedings could not be maintained. The exclusion of this time period was consequently permitted, effectively extending the limitation timeline for the suit's filing.
HC ruled that the period from 13th March 2018 to 26th November 2019 shall be excluded in computing the limitation period for suit filing under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court found the IBC proceedings were bona fide, noting operational creditors routinely file such proceedings due to corporate debtor's potential inability to satisfy debts. The defendant could not challenge the plaintiff's good faith in initiating IBC proceedings, and no assertion was made that such proceedings could not be maintained. The exclusion of this time period was consequently permitted, effectively extending the limitation timeline for the suit's filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.