Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
281 to 300 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled that the period from 13th March 2018 to 26th November 2019 shall be excluded in computing the limitation period for suit filing under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court found the IBC proceedings were bona fide, noting operational creditors routinely file such proceedings due to corporate debtor's potential inability to satisfy debts. The defendant could not challenge the plaintiff's good faith in initiating IBC proceedings, and no assertion was made that such proceedings could not be maintained. The exclusion of this time period was consequently permitted, effectively extending the limitation timeline for the suit's filing.
HC ruled that the period from 13th March 2018 to 26th November 2019 shall be excluded in computing the limitation period for suit filing under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court found the IBC proceedings were bona fide, noting operational creditors routinely file such proceedings due to corporate debtor's potential inability to satisfy debts. The defendant could not challenge the plaintiff's good faith in initiating IBC proceedings, and no assertion was made that such proceedings could not be maintained. The exclusion of this time period was consequently permitted, effectively extending the limitation timeline for the suit's filing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.