Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an arrest order under PMLA, finding no territorial jurisdiction. The scheduled offence was registered in Saharanpur, UP, with the Special Court passing the remand order. Despite initial investigative activities in Himachal Pradesh, the primary cause of action and subsequent proceedings were located in UP. The court held that mere preliminary investigative steps do not confer jurisdictional rights, and the trial of money laundering offences should follow the predicate scheduled offence's jurisdiction. Consequently, the HC determined it lacks competence to examine the merits of the arrest order, resulting in the petition's dismissal.
HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an arrest order under PMLA, finding no territorial jurisdiction. The scheduled offence was registered in Saharanpur, UP, with the Special Court passing the remand order. Despite initial investigative activities in Himachal Pradesh, the primary cause of action and subsequent proceedings were located in UP. The court held that mere preliminary investigative steps do not confer jurisdictional rights, and the trial of money laundering offences should follow the predicate scheduled offence's jurisdiction. Consequently, the HC determined it lacks competence to examine the merits of the arrest order, resulting in the petition's dismissal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
